background

The European Commission takes legal action against pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca

The vaccination campaign has been highly critical since the first months. The continued tensions led the European Commission, at the instigation of the 27 member states, to decide to take legal action against AstraZeneca. According to the official note, the pharmaceutical giant was guilty of "failing to present a reliable strategy" on vaccine deliveries[1].

Given the problems that have become evident in recent months, the news is not surprising. Delays and precautionary stops to vaccinations had repeatedly put the spotlight on a supply system that was very deficient in relation to the Old Continent.

The shortcomings that characterised the negotiation phase carried out by the Commission made the situation complex and did not exempt the European institutions from controversy at national level. This is particularly true of the decision to set delivery quotas on a quarterly rather than weekly basis. This decision, which was also taken with regard to the other pharmaceutical companies and the contracts concluded with them, did not allow supplies to be tracked on time. On the contrary, it allowed the company, within the three months available, to accelerate or slow down the pace of production of vaccines in a completely autonomous way, without repercussions or stringent controls and with the only constraint that at the end of each deadline deliveries were respected.

This delicate problem was made worse by the lack of strong rigidity in the contract, which on the contrary was extremely flexible and not very incisive with regard to penalties in the event of violations or non-compliance.

In this regard, it is important to remember that sanctions are not automatic. In case a violation is detected, it will be the Commission's intervention, through a new negotiation with the pharmaceutical company, to determine the "remedy", which may take different forms[2].

Four months into the vaccination campaign and faced with the same problems as presented above, the conflict has resulted in the European Commission's decision to take legal action against AstraZeneca. On the other hand, the pharmaceutical giant's response was not long in coming either, stating that it felt extremely 'regretful about the EU Commission's decision to take legal action on COVID-19 vaccine supplies'. It also announced in an official statement that it would "strongly defend itself in court"[3].

This affair will have an extremely important impact, especially on the future. Given the need for supplies in order to achieve high levels of immunisation, this was followed by a further blowback. In fact, an official note from Downing Street was not long in coming, in which, without entering directly into the matter, the extraordinary results and the first-class role played by AstraZeneca in recent months were recalled. This was a positive and counter-trend assessment of the British company's performance[4].

All this has brought out the extent to which the vaccination issue goes beyond the health emergency, with implications for international relations. Symbols of these dynamics are precisely the connections, not always positive, with international partners, such as the United Kingdom and the United States: the decision to shelve thousands of AstraZeneca vaccines is proof of this[5].

Faced with this situation, it is necessary to take into account that Europe absolutely cannot do without AstraZeneca in order to ensure an increase in the vaccination campaign and to consolidate the waning confidence in the European institutions. At the same time, it must avoid the emergence of a 'race' to buy vaccines at national level, which could have negative implications for the already fragile balance.

Translated by: Elena Briasco

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/italy/news/20210426_dichiarazione_della_commissaria_Kyriakides_sulla_valutazione_di_ema_sul_vaccino_Astrazeneca_it

[2] https://www.corriere.it/esteri/21_gennaio_28/vaccino-covid-penali-rischi-guerra-ue-astrazeneca-9abee34a-60e4-11eb-b90c-509c7d96fdd2.shtml

[3] https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/topnews/2021/04/26/astrazeneca-lue-ha-avviato-lazione-legale_4a3a13a3-12e1-4d37-b5ec-aa3b8b250b63.html

[4] https://www.ansa.it/europa/notizie/rubriche/altrenews/2021/04/26/lue-ha-avviato-lazione-legale-nei-confronti-di-astrazeneca_15fe2fe8-f2ff-4891-957c-9004b683e862.html

[5] https://www.ilfoglio.it/esteri/2021/03/17/news/perche-l-america-non-usa-astrazeneca-2039500/


Share the post

  • L'Autore

    Tiziano Sini

    Tiziano Sini dopo aver conseguito la laurea triennale in Scienze politiche presso la facoltà "Cesare Alfieri" di Firenze, si specializza presso la Luiss "Guido Carli" di Roma in Relazioni Internazionale con una tesi in Economia Europea sull'analisi dell'European Green Deal e la relazione con le politiche promosse dal Next Generation Eu.

    Da sempre appassionato di politica nazionale ed internazionale, con uno sguardo sempre rivolto alla dimensione economica.

    All'interno di Mondo Internazionale ricopre la carica di autore occupandosi di tematiche europee.

    Tiziano Sini after having obtained the Bachelor's Degree in Political Science at faculty "Cesare Alfieri" of Florence, majored at Luiss "Guido Carli" of Rome in International Relations with dissertation in European Economy on the analysis of the European Green Deal and the relationship with policies promoted by the Next Generation Eu.

    He was always been passionate about national and international politics, always looking at the economic dimension.

    In the context of Mondo Internazionale he holds the position of author dealing with European affairs.


Categories

Sections International Organizations European Union


Tag

EuropeanCommission EuropeanUnion vaccines AstraZeneca bruxelles Great Britain Brexit

You might be interested in

Image

European April

Michele Bodei
Image

The G20 in Matera

Valeria Lavano
Image

The future of youth work in the context of the Bonn process: the digital challenge

Redazione
Log in to your Mondo Internazionale account
Forgot Password? Get it back here